Skip to main content

Alexander Kropper

Submission in response to discussion paper

Some have argued that past changes to the EPBC Act to add new matters of national environmental significance did not go far enough. Others have argued it has extended the regulatory reach of the Commonwealth too far. What do you think?

we need to add greater protections for wildlife, as well as prevent destructive industries from running rampant.

What additional future trends or supporting evidence should be drawn on to inform the review?

Climate scientist need to be listened to, and their advice followed.


Additional information has been provided as an attachment for this submission. The attachment can be downloaded using the links on the right hand side of this page.

Additional information

Supplementary navigation and content


Submission ID

In response to

Discussion paper
Alexander Kropper


Threatened species
Public participation in decision making
Matters of National Environmental Significance
Great Barrier Reef
Environmental Impact Assessments
Cumulative impacts
Climate Change