Submission in response to discussion paper
Some have argued that past changes to the EPBC Act to add new matters of national environmental significance did not go far enough. Others have argued it has extended the regulatory reach of the Commonwealth too far. What do you think?
we need to add greater protections for wildlife, as well as prevent destructive industries from running rampant.
What additional future trends or supporting evidence should be drawn on to inform the review?
Climate scientist need to be listened to, and their advice followed.
Additional information has been provided as an attachment for this submission. The attachment can be downloaded using the links on the right hand side of this page.