1.2 - The EPBC Act does not enable the Commonwealth to play its part in managing Australia’s environment
1.2.1 Managing Australia’s environment is a shared responsibility
The construct of Australia’s federation means that the management of Australia’s environment is a shared responsibility, and jurisdictions need to work effectively together and in partnership with the community.
The Commonwealth, on behalf of the nation, has signed up to international agreements on the environment and has a responsibility to ensure they are implemented8. The Commonwealth’s responsibilities in managing the environment have been confirmed by High Court decisions over time and agreed in foundational intergovernmental agreements on the environment9. These agreements reflect the respective constitutional responsibilities of the Commonwealth and states and territories. The Commonwealth’s interests are known as ‘matters of national environmental significance’ (MNES).
The EPBC Act implements the Commonwealth's responsibility for key MNES10. Changes over time, including to MNES, have contributed to a drift in the Commonwealth's role and introduced duplication with the role of the states and territories. This is particularly the case for MNES that focus on activities that give rise to threats or risks to the environment, rather than protection of the environmental matter itself.
Ultimately, Australia’s system of environment and heritage protection management must recognise the respective roles of the Commonwealth and states and territories, and jurisdictions need to work together effectively. This was acknowledged in the foundational intergovernmental agreements, which committed to an intent of harmonised laws and regulatory systems, based on clear interests and where possible accommodating their respective responsibilities. This direction was embedded in the original design of the EPBC Act, but the implementation of the Act has failed to fulfil this ambition.
The EPBC Act is also the mechanism for the Commonwealth to regulate the environment on Commonwealth land and waters, and the environmental activities undertaken by the Commonwealth.
Footnotes
[8] For further information on international agreements, see the EPBC Act Review Factsheet on Scope of the EPBC Act.
[9] Examples of foundational agreements on the environment are the Inter-Governmental Agreement on the Environment (1992) and the Heads of Agreement on Commonwealth/State Roles and Responsibilities for the Environment (1997).
[10] For further information on matters of national environmental significance protected by the EPBC Act, see the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment web page ‘What does the EPBC Act protect?’
Additional information
Supplementary navigation and content
Contents
- Foreword
- The Review and how to have your say
- Summary points
- Executive Summary
-
Chapter 1 - National level protection and conservation of the environment and iconic places
- 1.1 - The environment and iconic places are in decline and under increasing threat
- 1.2 - The EPBC Act does not enable the Commonwealth to play its part in managing Australia’s environment
- 1.3 - The EPBC Act does not enable the Commonwealth to effectively protect and conserve nationally important matters
- 1.4 - Proposed key reform directions
- Chapter 2 - Indigenous culture and heritage
- Chapter 3 - Legislative complexity
- Chapter 4 - Efficiency
- Chapter 5 - Trust in the EPBC Act
- Chapter 6 - Data, information and systems
- Chapter 7 - Monitoring, evaluation and reporting
- Chapter 8 - Restoration
- Chapter 9 - Compliance, enforcement and assurance
- Chapter 10 - Proposed reform pathway
- Appendix 1 - Prototype National Environmental Standard for Matters of National Environmental Significance